Intellectual Property as Collateral: The Future of Indonesian Intellectual Property Legal Policy in Commercial Transactions
Main Article Content
Abstract
The economic value of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is universally recognized and can be utilized as a form of collateral to secure bank loans. The validity of this assertion has been established within the international framework and demonstrated through the established practices of various nations, including the United States and the United Kingdom, which have been analyzed in this research. In response to the remarkable expansion of creative actors, Indonesia implemented Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022 concerning the Creative Economy, which permits the use of intellectual property as collateral for debt to tackle financing obstacles. This research aims to closely examine how intellectual property (IP) is used as a guarantee for loans in Indonesia and other selected jurisdictions. It will investigate the problems and risks tied to this type of lending and discuss possible ways for the government to address these issues. This study discovered that while Indonesian law allows the use of IP as collateral, its actual application is limited due to a lack of understanding among both the general public and business sector regarding the comprehensive policies and procedures. Additionally, this study also proposes potential solutions for the future of IP in commercial transactions as mortgages.
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ackleson, Jason. “Directions in Border Security Research.” The Social Science Journal 40, no. 4 (December 1, 2003): 573–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00069-7.
Antasena, Denny. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” Universitas Yarsi, 2019.
Arcani, Ni K, and Ida A Sukihana. “Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Perbankan.” Kertha Semaya 10, no. 6 (2022).
“ASA Providing Value Worldwide,” n.d. https://www.appraisers.org/home.
Asril, Fitri Astari. “The Directorate General of Intellectual Property (‘DGIP’) Is a Governmental Agency Overseeing Intellectual Property Rights System in Indonesia.” A&Co Law Office, 2023. https://aco-law.com/articles/ip-consultant-in-indonesia-understanding-the-government-regulation-number-100-of-2021/.
Assmus, Richard M. “Value and Risk Considerations for Intellectual Property Collateral.” American Bar Association, 2022. https://www.americanbar.org.
Atikah, Ika. “Intellectual Property Rights As The Resource For Creative Economic In Indonesia.” JPHDJ 22, no. 4 (2022).
Auliya Ahmad Suhardi, Indri Andini, Nur Afria Nanda Safitri, and Purnama Ramadani Silalah. “Peran Perdagangan Internasional Dalam Meningkatkan Produktivitas Perekonomian Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Kreatif 1, no. 1 (December 26, 2022): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.59024/jumek.v1i1.33.
Bahsan, M. Hukum Jaminan Dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 9/6/PBI/2007 of 2007 (n.d.).
Bently, Lionel. Intellectual Property Law. London: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022.
Bishop, Jody C. “The Challenge of Valuing Intellectual Property Assets.” NJTIP 1, no. 1 (2003).
Bragazzi, Nicola, and Giovanni Del Puente. “A Proposal for Including Nomophobia in the New Dsm-V.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management, May 2014, 155. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S41386.
Bury, Liz. “Aon Sources $35mn in IP-Collateralised Funding to Start-up BrainScope.” Trading Risk, 2021. https://www.trading-risk.com.
China IP. “Jointown and Goaland Secure Multi-Mln Financing with Pledged IP Assets.” China IP Today, 2022. http://www.chinaiptoday.com/post.html?id=1821.
Companies Act of United Kingdom 2006 (n.d.).
Creative Economy Regulation (n.d.).
Criss, Jennifer T. “It’s Perfect! Or, Perfecting Security Interests in Intellectual Property.” National Law Review, 2019.
European Commission. “Intellectual Property and Access to Finance for High Growth SMEs,” 2006.
Fernando, Jason. “Gross Domestic Product (GDP): Formula and How to Use It.” Investopedia, 2023.
Garten, Mark. “UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Is a United Nations Body That Works to Promote the Harmonization and Modernization of International Trade Laws.” United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 2021.
Hadi, Abdul, and Bima Guntara. “Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional Dalam Upaya Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Era Distrupsi Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence).” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 233. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i1.2426.
Hamel, Heather. “Valuing the Intangible: Mission Impossible? An Analysis of the Intellectual Property Valuation Process.” Forbes, 2014. https://www.forbes.com.
Heriyanto, Dodik Setiawan Nur, and Alif Muhamad Gultom. “The Power of Legal Certainty in the Trademark Exhaustion Principle Governing Parallel Imports.” Audito Comparative Law Journal 4, no. 2 (2023).
“In Legal Terms, Perfection Refers to the Additional Steps That Must Be Taken to Make a Security Interest Become Legally Binding and Protected against Claims from the Third Parties,” n.d.
Indonesia Civil Code (n.d.).
Indonesia Government Regulation No. 24 of 2022 on Creative Economy (n.d.).
Indonesian Law No. 8 of 2014 concerning Copyright (n.d.).
Indonesian Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee (n.d.).
Jacobs, Brian W. “Using Intellectual Property to Secure Financing after the Worst Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression.” University of Georgia, 2011.
Junior, Mike F, and Nancy Tartaglione. “Cannes: EuropaCorp Signs $450M Credit Facility To Finance English-Language Pics,” 2014. https://deadline.com/2014/05/cannes-europacorp-signs-450m-credit-facility-to-finance-english-lingo-pics-731450/.
Kerr, Teressa N. “Bowie Bonding in the Music Biz: Will Music Royalty Securitization Be the Key to the Gold for Music Industry Participants?” UCLA Entertainment Law Review 7, no. 2 (2000).
“Kodak Had Predicted That They Would Sell Their Company for $2.6 Billion, but the Actual Selling Price Was Much Lower at around $525 Million.,” n.d.
“Kodak Is a Major Company That Operates Worldwide and Specializes in Commercial Printing, as Well as Advanced Materials and Chemicals,” n.d.
Kurnianingrum, Trias P. “Intellectual Property as Banking Credit Guarantee.” Negara Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017).
Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patent (n.d.).
Lazic, Marija. “Crucial Intellectual Property Statistics.” USOPTO, 2023. https://legaljobs.io/blog/intellectual-property-statistics/.
Lichtschein, Aaron. “The Ongoing Gold Rush in Music Catalog Sales.” JIPEL, 2022. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/the-ongoing-gold-rush-in-music-catalog-sales/.
Macmillan, Laura. “David Bowie Was a Renowned English Musician, Songwriter, and Performer.” Hello Music Theory, 2023. https://hellomusictheory.com/learn/famous-british-singers/.
Mann, William. “Creditor Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Patent Collateral.” JFE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.07.001.
Martin, Andrew. “Kodak to Sell Digital Imaging Patents for $525 Million.” The Newyork Times, 2012. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/business/kodak-to-sell-patents-for-525-million.html.
McDonald, John W. “The Institute for Multi-Track Diplomacy.” Journal of Conflictology 3, no. 2 (December 13, 2012). https://doi.org/10.7238/joc.v3i2.1629.
Mendel, Toby, Andrew Puddephatt, Ben Wagner, Dixie Hawtin, and Natalia Torres. Global Survey on Internet Privacy and Freedom of Expression. UNESCO, 2012.
Ministry of Tourism and Creative Economy 2021 (n.d.).
Muchtar, Novianty H. “Development of a Valuation System of Technology for the Enhancement of Innovation in Indonesia.” Heliyon 9, no. 2 (2023).
Mulyani, Sri. “Realitas Pengakuan Hukum Terhadap Hak Atas Merek Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Pada Praktik Perbankan Di Indonesia.” JIHDM 112 (2014).
Nguyen, Xuan-Thao. “Collateralizing Intellectual Property.” Georgia Law Review 42, no. 1 (2007).
———. “The Puzzle in Financing with Trademark Collateral.” Houston Law Review 56, no. 2 (2018).
Nijman, Vincent. “An Overview of International Wildlife Trade from Southeast Asia.” Biodiversity and Conservation 19, no. 4 (April 2010): 1101–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9758-4.
Niscaya, Nia. “Webinar Prospek Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Sebagai Jaminan Utang,” 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PW4QlIK7_U&t=7073s.
Owens, Marilee, and Richards. The Collateralisation and Securitisation of Intellectual Property. London. Queen Mary, University of London, 2016.
Reskin, Gerid, and Wirdyaningsih. “Pengaturan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Utang Menurut PP Nomor 24 Tahun 2022.” PLR 8, no. 4 (2022).
Reuters, Thomson. “The Guide Has Had a Notable Impact on Legislators and Organizations, for Example in the Adoption of Australia’s Personal Property Securities Act 2009 and the Drafting of South Korea’s Secured Transactions Law; Richard Kohn and Goldberg Kohn, ‘The UNCITRAL.” United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 2010. https://content.next.westlaw.com.
RICS. “Valuation of Intellectual Property Rights,” 2020. https://www.rics.org.
Rozen, Miriam. “Inventors Learn to Deploy Their Assets as Collateral.” Financial Times, 2020. https://www.ft.com.
Shafira, Wulan C. “Good News: Youtube Content Can Be a Loan Collateral.” Digital Creators, 2023. https://ambadar.co.id/article/detail/digital-creators-good-news-youtube-content-can-be-a-loan-collateral.
Simensky, Melvin. The New Role of Intellectual Property in Commercial Transactions. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
Sukarmijan, Sati, and Olivia Sapong. “The Importance of Intellectual Property for SMEs; Challenges and Moving Forward.” UMKP, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.umkpro.2014.07.010.
Susanti, Sanya D. “OJK Siapkan Kerangka Regulasi Dukung HAKI Sebagai Jaminan Utang.” Antaran News, 2022. https://www.antaranews.com.
Tosato, Andrea. “The UNCITRAL Annex on Security Rights in IP: A Work in Progress.” JIPLP, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpp128.
Trademarks Act of United Kingdom 1994 (n.d.).
“UCC Uniform Commercial Code,” n.d. https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/ucc.
UKIPO. “Guidance Valuing Your Intellectual Property.” GOV.UK, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/valuing-your-intellectual-property.
United States v. Antenna Systems, Inc. (1966).
USTR. “USTR Releases 2022 Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement,” 2022. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2022/april/ustr-releases-2022-special-301-report-intellectual-property-protection-and-enforcement.
WIPO. “What Is Intellectual Property?,” n.d. https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/.