Implementasi Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Dalam Sengketa Persekongkolan Tender Pengadaan Barang Pemerintah Di Nusa Tenggara Barat
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Purpose of The Research Is to Examine the Implementation of Article 22 of Law No. 5 of 1999, Related to The Tender Conspiracy Carried Out by Business Actors In The Procurement of Government Goods In West Nusa Tenggara and The Legal Consequences of The Existence of Tender Conspiracy In The Procurement of Government Goods. The Research Approach Used in This Research Is Empirical Juridical Research. Legislative Approach, Conceptual and Case Approach. In This Study, Primary and Secondary Data Sources Were Used. The Method of Analysis Is a Qualitative Description Method. The Results of The Study That the Government Procurement of Goods in West Nusa Tenggara is in Accordance with Article 22 of Law No. 5 Of 1999 And Has Applied the Principles of Business Competition, Namely Efficient, Effective, Open and Competitive, Transparent, Fair/Non-Discriminatory, And Accountable. The Juridical Consequences of The Tender Conspiracy in The Procurement of Government Goods Will Be Subject to Sanctions in The Form of Cancellation of Bids, Disbursement of Bid Guarantees And Deposited In The State Treasury, As Well As The Proposed Imposition of a Black List on The Budget User Proxy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Buku
KPPU. (2007). Pedoman Pasal 22 tentang Larangan Persekongkolan dalam Tender Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jakarta: Cetakan ke-IV.
Soemitro, Rachmat. (1987). Peraturan dan Istruksi Lelang, Bandung: Eresco.
Ramli, Samsul. (2014). Mengatasi Aneka Masalah Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, Jakarta: Visi Media.
Suratman dan H. Phillips Dillah. (2012). Metode Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Alfa Beta, 2012.
LPHEUI. (2000). Undang-Undang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jakarta: Lembaga Pengkajian Hukum Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Jurnal
Fauzi, Ahmad. (2021). Pengawasan Praktek Monopoli Sebagai Bentuk Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6 (2).
Savitri D, I Gusti Agung Ayu Istri Ngurah Intan dan I Made Sarjana. (2021). Penyelesaian Terhadap Persekongkolan Tender Di Dalam Suatu Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9 (4).
Krisanto, Yakub Adi. (2008). Terobosan Hukum Putusan KPPU dalam Mengembangkan Penafsiran Hukum Persekongkolan Tender (Analisis Putusan KPPU terhadap Pasal 22 UU No. 5/1999 Pasca Tahun 2006), Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 27(3).